Why do people succumb to anger?
It feels so easy to slip into its grasp. But at the same time, from a distance, it looks quite stupid. Aren't we overreacting? What's the point of hitting one another, yelling at one another, going to war with one another? Yet when are up close, immersed in anger, we feel nothing but blissful rage, if that makes sense. Sweet revenge empowers us. Makes us feel as if we are at the top of the world. Maybe it is a survival mechanism. But I sure wish it weren't.
|
|
Deja vu
Your eyes stare into a blur. Clouds of a dream of some fairy tale land loom ahead. You pass them. Trains of thought chug by. That TV show, those last few words left unfinished on paper, that gaping hole in your life. Going, gone, forgotten.
The blur clears and you stand up, marveling at your newfound perception of the world around you. Walking, talking, thinking seems so easy now. So this is how rebirth feels like.
A tender shoot of a vine springs out of the ground, intensifying in color and vitality. It spirals into a roller coaster of its own kind, kinks and knots everywhere. You'd hate to straighten that out.
You see a path in the distance, and squinting you see a figure roaming around. He looks around, hungry for the sights and tastes of this world.
Deja vu. Doesn't everything seem to be something you've seen before? Doesn't everything you discover seem to have already been in your head? Maybe you've discovered this land a thousand times. Or maybe you haven't.
Je t'ai deja vu.
|
|
It's been a while
It's been a while! And with time, I have realized how conservative I am. I am arguing for lit speech that the ends do not justify the means, and that not a single person's rights can be sacrificed for any reason. No one deserves to have their rights taken.. It's simply not fair. But then I guess there is the question of what to do with the criminals and all. But aren't there alternative methods to imprisonment that don't take away the liberties of life? I have no idea how effective they are, though.
The main flaw I feel in the argument of the end justifying the means is what the end really is. Common good. But there are so many ways to interpret the common good. I mean, look at Hitler's one sided view of the common good of the "people". It's almost as if Jews weren't considered human by him. Same thing with imperialists. Studies by professors had been published stating that Africans were another species, which allowed the British and European powers to look at the good of the "people", just their own people, and decide to squash the Africans' rights. And we see that in the case of Britian oppressing India, and US oppressing Native Americans. It's everywhere..
I don't see what enables us to have the power to take away other people's rights. Who died and made us king? Who even said that we are superior to one another? Why can't we all be equal? Why can't everyone just accept each other for who they are and just be happy. No strife, no worry, just peace. Is it too much to ask for?
We were looking at ways that powers maintained control in a country: divide and conquer the people. Set one group above another and set both groups to fighting. It's so inhumane; how can we just sit happily and cause the lives of millions to be lost- just for our own gain. Really, did Europe HAVE to go to Africa? Does there really have to be this competitive spirit where one country feels the need to take over another and to make the inhabitants of that country suffer?
It's just not right.
|
|
|
Deja vu
Your eyes stare into a blur. Clouds of a dream of some fairy tale land loom ahead. You pass them. Trains of thought chug by. That TV show, those last few words left unfinished on paper, that gaping hole in your life. Going, gone, forgotten.
The blur clears and you stand up, marveling at your newfound perception of the world around you. Walking, talking, thinking seems so easy now. So this is how rebirth feels like.
A tender shoot of a vine springs out of the ground, intensifying in color and vitality. It spirals into a roller coaster of its own kind, kinks and knots everywhere. You'd hate to straighten that out.
You see a path in the distance, and squinting you see a figure roaming around. He looks around, hungry for the sights and tastes of this world.
Deja vu. Doesn't everything seem to be something you've seen before? Doesn't everything you discover seem to have already been in your head? Maybe you've discovered this land a thousand times. Or maybe you haven't.
Je t'ai deja vu.
|
|
It's been a while
It's been a while! And with time, I have realized how conservative I am. I am arguing for lit speech that the ends do not justify the means, and that not a single person's rights can be sacrificed for any reason. No one deserves to have their rights taken.. It's simply not fair. But then I guess there is the question of what to do with the criminals and all. But aren't there alternative methods to imprisonment that don't take away the liberties of life? I have no idea how effective they are, though.
The main flaw I feel in the argument of the end justifying the means is what the end really is. Common good. But there are so many ways to interpret the common good. I mean, look at Hitler's one sided view of the common good of the "people". It's almost as if Jews weren't considered human by him. Same thing with imperialists. Studies by professors had been published stating that Africans were another species, which allowed the British and European powers to look at the good of the "people", just their own people, and decide to squash the Africans' rights. And we see that in the case of Britian oppressing India, and US oppressing Native Americans. It's everywhere..
I don't see what enables us to have the power to take away other people's rights. Who died and made us king? Who even said that we are superior to one another? Why can't we all be equal? Why can't everyone just accept each other for who they are and just be happy. No strife, no worry, just peace. Is it too much to ask for?
We were looking at ways that powers maintained control in a country: divide and conquer the people. Set one group above another and set both groups to fighting. It's so inhumane; how can we just sit happily and cause the lives of millions to be lost- just for our own gain. Really, did Europe HAVE to go to Africa? Does there really have to be this competitive spirit where one country feels the need to take over another and to make the inhabitants of that country suffer?
It's just not right.
|
|
tagboard.
|
archives.
By post:
writing
qu'est-ce que c'est que l'amour?
freedom of choice
confiance
poker face
confidence
négliger
le choque
silent b
toute seule
By month:
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
November 2010
March 2011
February 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
August 2013
|
affiliates.
Just Koe
Thought of Life
Credits
Layout: Mary
Colours: refuted
Host: blogger
|